Learn more about Chamber Circles for Women and Entrepreneurs
|
||
The uncertainty surrounding trade policies and the potential for sustained tariffs have already begun to erode business confidence in Ontario.
A survey conducted in February by the Ontario Chamber of Commerce (OCC) has revealed that more than 80% of businesses believe U.S. tariffs are clearly impacting confidence in Ontario’s economy.
Coupled with the results of the OCC’s 2025 Ontario Economic Report released last month which revealed that business confidence had risen from a historic low of 13% to only 26% in 2024, Canada’s economy remains in a precarious position in wake of U.S President Donald Trump’s continued tariffs attacks.
“The problem is we have Trump, a 78-year-old man trying to run a country in the same manner as it would have been run in 1968,” says Cambridge Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Greg Durocher. “But that country doesn’t exist anymore.”
He notes Trump’s continued claim that NATFA (North American Free Trade Agreement) resulted in the closure of 90,000 plants and factories in the U.S. is an exaggeration as well as touting that introducing exorbitant tariffs will eliminate the need for income tax.
Many industries at risk
“It’s literally impossible for that to happen,” says Greg, adding revenue from tariffs would equate to about 2% of the U.S. budget. “His whole end game centres on minerals, considering all he talks about is titanium and lithium from Ukraine. There’s no question about it.”
But in the wake of this pursuit, experts agree the impact of sustained tariffs will hit Canada hard.
The manufacturing sector stands at the forefront of potential adverse effects due to its substantial contribution to Ontario's economy and its heavy reliance on U.S. markets.
The automotive industry, a cornerstone of Ontario's manufacturing base, is especially vulnerable. Tariffs could render Canadian auto parts and vehicles less competitive, leading U.S. companies to seek alternative suppliers. This shift threatens to result in decreased production, layoffs, and a contraction within the sector.
Beyond automotive manufacturing, other industries such as steel and aluminum production are also at risk.
In retaliation to the U.S. tariffs, the federal government has already announced a $155 billion tariff package targeting various U.S. goods. The first phase included 25% tariffs on $30 billion worth of U.S. imports, confirmed March 4, encompassing products like orange juice, peanut butter, wine, spirits, beer, coffee, appliances, apparel, footwear, motorcycles, cosmetics, and pulp and paper.
An additional list targeting $125 billion worth of U.S. goods is under consideration on products such as electric vehicles, trucks and buses, certain fruits and vegetables, aerospace products, beef, pork, and dairy.
Businesses ready to adapt
While these countermeasures aim to protect Canadian interests, they also risk escalating trade tensions, potentially leading to a trade war that could further destabilize Ontario's economy.
The results of the OCC tariffs survey reflect these concerns considering 77% of the 600 respondents said they expect U.S. tariffs will negatively impact their business, while slightly fewer (74%) believe that Canadian tariffs will have a negative impact.
However, when it comes to adapting to U.S. tariffs, approximately half (52%) of the respondents remain confident in their businesses ability to do so, something that doesn’t surprise Greg.
“When Canadian entrepreneurs are pushed, they become very structured and organized and say if our only option is to branch out and look elsewhere, then we're prepared to do that,” he says, adding having 52% of business owners prepared to seek other opportunities and avenues is a positive sign. “It just demonstrates that the structure of the businesses in Canada are probably more resilient than they are anywhere else, even compared to businesses in the U.S. They’re not relying on Donald Trump when it comes to changing his mind, they're relying more on themselves.”
Key findings of the OCC tariffs survey
The OCC conducted an online survey from Feb. 7-23 in co-ordination with local Chambers and Boards of Trade
Business confidence
Business impacts of U.S. tariffs
Adapting business to U.S. tariffs
Click here to read survey results. |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The impact of U.S. President Donald Trump’s 25% tariffs on Canadian imports and Canada’s counter tariffs has significant implications for various sectors of our economy, including tourism, with Ontario poised to experience both direct and indirect effects on this industry.
The Canada-U.S. border has traditionally seen substantial movement of tourists in both directions. However, these escalating trade tensions have led to a surge in nationalistic sentiments, influencing travel decisions. Reports have indicated that many Canadians plan to boycott travel to the U.S. in response to Trump’s tariffs, opting instead for domestic destinations or alternative international locations, a trend that has not gone unnoticed by tourism experts.
“We're hearing that 40% of Canadians that had booked a trip to the U.S. have cancelled their plans,” says Explore Waterloo Region CEO Michele Saran, noting travel destinations nationwide are expecting an uptick in tourists this summer. “If I was a Canadian destination that actively pursued the U.S. market, right now I would be pushing the exchange rate really hard.”
Potential side-effects
However, economic downturns typically result in reduced disposable income, which can lead to a decline in domestic tourism as residents may cut back on travel and leisure activities.
Moreover, the weakening of the Canadian dollar is likely to make international travel more expensive for Canadians, potentially reducing outbound tourism. But on the flipside, a weaker Canadian dollar could make Canada a more attractive destination for foreign tourists, as their currencies would have greater purchasing power.
There are also potential side-effects surrounding the impact heightened political tensions and changes in consumer sentiment that have been created.
“I have been told that Americans are expressing concern about how they'll be treated if they come to Canada right now,” says Michele. “So, they're a little bit reticent about it right now. But from a leisure travel perspective, Waterloo Region has always focused on marketing in Southern Ontario.”
In fact, she says the travel organization is in the process of creating and promoting new packages to encourage visitors to spend more time here once they arrive.
Specific marketing
“We want to provide them with options they can’t find in downtown Toronto,” she says of this new promotional tactic. “We're giving them an itinerary so that they'll be able to create a mental movie of a staycation in Waterloo Region and how they could spend their time here.”
Michele says Explore Waterloo Region is conducting specific marketing targeted at couples, families and groups of friends highlighting the authentic ‘experiences’ that cities located on the edge of nature can offer.
“We're testing them right now at the target market to make sure we mitigate any risk to make sure that these markets find them compelling,” she says, noting Waterloo Region’s proximity to the GTA will likely prove to be an even bigger advantage this year. “About 90% of our leisure visitors come from that area. It’s easy to get here and we also have we have both rural and urban, so there's something for everyone when you come to the region.”
Annually, Waterloo Region attracts approximately five million visitors not just for leisure visits, but conferences, meetings, and sporting events, which translates into nearly $560 million for the local economy.
To learn more, visit Explore Waterloo Region.
Tourism stats:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The high cost of living, inflation, housing affordability, and rising operational costs top the lists of concerns for Ontario businesses, according to the Ontario Chamber of Commerce’s (OCC) most recent Ontario Economic Report (OER).
The report shows a significant rise in business confidence over the course of 2024, climbing from a historic low of 13% to 26% by year’s end. Despite this improvement, confidence remains historically low and fragile, with 48% of businesses expressing a lack of confidence in the economy. Affordability and the cost of living continue to be the most pressing concerns for businesses.
The survey, conducted between October 15 and December 2, 2024, gathered insights from 1,714 respondents representing a diverse range of industries, regions, and organizations.
The results show that when U.S. tariff threats are on the table, business confidence drops dramatically to just 15%, almost erasing the last year’s gains, according to the OCC’s separate tariff survey in early February. This recent research also shows that with tariffs in play, six in ten (60%) business decision makers would lack confidence in Ontario’s economic outlook.
“I may not use the word fragile describing the confidence level and instead use the word tempered,” says Cambridge Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Greg Durocher. “People's optimism for the future of business in the short term is tempered by the impact of Trump’s tariffs. I think most people in business realize that the impact of any decision is probably going to be short term. Whether or not tariffs are long term isn't the issue, it’s the impact of tariffs. So, after a period time, the marketplace settles down and people get used to whatever is the new reality.”
Ontario’s economic outlook varies
Confidence in Ontario’s economic outlook varies significantly across industries, with the information and cultural industries sector reporting the lowest level of optimism at just 17%. Businesses in this sector cite high operational costs, shifting consumer behaviour, declining advertising revenues, and mounting pressures from technological disruption, global competition, and regulatory challenges as key drivers of their pessimism.
The retail (18%), non-profit (20%), utilities (21%), and accommodation and food services (22%) sectors follow closely, reflecting the impact of declining consumer spending amid heightened cost-of-living pressures.
The agriculture sector, while showing a slight improvement over last year, also remains among the least confident sectors (22%). Concerns in this sector centre on extreme weather events, trade and supply chain barriers, and growing labour gaps and succession planning challenges as a significant portion of the workforce approaches retirement.
By contrast, confidence is strongest in the mining (56%), finance and insurance (40%), and administrative and waste management services (40%) sectors. This could be explained by the strong demand for critical minerals supported by Ontario’s Critical Minerals Strategy, rising sustainability initiatives the finance sector’s ongoing resilience, and growth driven by fintech advancements. These sectors demonstrate adaptability and the ability to capitalize on emerging opportunities.
Survey respondents remain optimistic
Regionally, most of Ontario’s regions outside the GTA saw a significant reduction in confidence compared to the previous year.
Confidence is lowest in Stratford-Bruce Peninsula (19%), Northeast Ontario (21%), and the Greater Ottawa Area (21%), where in addition to concerns surrounding high costs and housing affordability, businesses are disproportionately sensitive to government policies and investments and have suffered more extreme weather events than other regions.
Confidence is highest in the Greater London Area (34%), a significant rebound from last year (9%). This resurgence is likely fueled by strong consumer demand, and domestic manufacturing capacity and supply chains, including the announcement of the Volkswagen EV battery plant in St. Thomas.
Despite the challenges, respondents report relative optimism about their own business growth prospects. Nearly half (49%) express confidence in their own future, citing factors such as strong consumer demand, innovation, and improved inflation management, something that doesn’t surprise Greg.
“I think that you'll find that there's going to be a growth and optimism because many sectors in Canada are going to strengthen as a result,” he says. “We’ve never been the ‘buy Canadian’ kind of a nation and the U.S. has always had buy American programs in place because we’ve always understood we were a player in the global market.”
He says there are initiatives created by the Provincial and Federal governments to encourage Canadian businesses to look at other, more reliable markets, rather than depending on the American market.
European Union agreement key
“Why we perceive the U.S. market to be unreliable right now is because anything that the American government does that impacts the trade with their nation is exponential in our case because 80 per cent of our GDP goes to the United States,” says Greg. “So, we're vulnerable to every whim of the U.S. government. For us to get more reliable sources, we need to diversify so we need to have relationships in the European Union.”
He notes the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, which Canada signed in the fall of 2016, has been underutilized.
“I think it stands to reason that we have not served ourselves well by not really looking seriously at the European Union for economic trade,” says Greg, noting this happened primarily because of our expectation the U.S. would always remain a reliable trading partner.
“We need to understand what the reality of this is going to be going forward and whether we do get aggressive when it comes to find other trading partners. And if Canadians continue to buy Canadian that will really impact the U.S. exponentially because we do consume a lot of American products.”
Click here to read the report.
Report highlights:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
While the recent 30-day postponement of U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs and Canada’s retaliatory measures came as welcomed news to businesses, the lingering presence of these threats remain prompting the Chamber network to act using a variety of tactics, including advocacy, negotiation, education and promoting partnerships.
Trump’s demand for 25 per cent blanket tariffs on all Canadian goods, with the exception of a 10 per cent tariff on Canadian energy, and Canada’s proposed retaliatory tariffs on $155 billion of U.S. goods, has sent economic shockwaves through both nations prompting calls for action on both sides of the border.
To clearly map out the vital importance of the trading relationship between the two countries and the risks businesses face, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce’s Business Data Lab has introduced the Canada-U.S. Trade Tracker —a new tool designed to illustrate the ties between the two economies. It notes that $3.6 billion in goods crosses the Canada-U.S. border daily, generating a $1.3 trillion annual trade relationship.
"A 30-day delay means more time for Canadian businesses and governments to drive home the point that tariffs make no sense between the two closest allies the world has ever known,” said Candace Laing, President and CEO, Canadian Chamber of Commerce, in a release. “The Canadian Chamber, our network and businesses across the country will spend every day of it fighting hard to secure this historic, robust trading relationship. Raising the cost of living for Americans and Canadians with these taxes is the wrong move. Canada and the U.S. make things together, and we should in fact be building on that.”
Call to dismantle interprovincial trade barriers
It is a sentiment echoed by her colleagues at the Ontario Chamber of Commerce who have rallied their members, which includes the Cambridge Chamber, in a show of unity and strength and targeted actions including supporting a unified call for Canadian premiers to quickly dismantle interprovincial trade barriers and the creation of a business and trade leadership coalition.
Called the Ontario Business & Trade Leadership Coalition (OBTLC), it aims to unit leaders from key trade-dependent sectors to champion business-driven solutions, advocate for effective government policies, and solidify Ontario’s position as a global leader in trade.
“President Trump has claimed the U.S. doesn’t need Canada – but we are here to show just how invaluable we are. Ontario businesses are stepping up to safeguard our economy and reinforce our global competitiveness,” said Daniel Tisch, President and CEO of the Ontario Chamber of Commerce, in a release. “The Ontario Business & Trade Leadership Coalition represents a united response – a coalition of industry leaders committed to resilience, collaboration, and growth.”
BestWR brings business groups together
But the fight to ward off economic turmoil caused by these tariff threats has also been ramped up locally, says Cambridge Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Greg Durocher, through the revival of a unique partnership created during the pandemic to assist businesses.
“We created the Business Economic Support Team of Waterloo Region (BestWR) during COIVD-19 consisting of organizations that are fundamentally engaged in the economic activities through business in the region and have brought it back as a support mechanism for local businesses with respect to trade,” he explains. “It was created during the pandemic, but this is now really about a united force of business organizations helping local businesses navigate these turbulent trade waters.”
Besides the Cambridge and Greater Kitchener Waterloo Chambers, BestWR also includes Waterloo EDC, Communitech and Explore Waterloo Region.
“We are engaged right now with regional municipalities to create opportunities whereby we can offer a support role in helping local businesses find local or Canadian suppliers, or to expose local businesses to the products they currently manufacture or sell and may be able to find Canadian customers for,” says Greg, noting BestWR also has strong federal and provincial connections which they will use to assist businesses.
“We have the insight to be able to tap into key levers within provincial government and within the federal government to have input on what potential supports those governments may need to provide businesses to keep them moving through this turmoil.”
Ask the Expert returns
As a further measure to assist, both the Cambridge and KW Chambers have revived their online tool 'Ask the Expert'.
These weekly Zoom calls - created during the pandemic to provide business leaders with current information – will now provide an opportunity for manufacturers and businesses in the region who export to the U.S. to ask questions.
“We will invite various experts to take part in the one-hour call, and hopefully get some answers to their questions and help them keep their business humming along and doing the things they need to do to support their employees,” says Greg.
'Ask the Expert' will take place every Thursday, between 9-10 a.m.
“This all about businesses,” he says. “And how do we navigate the turbulent challenges ahead and make it a win for Canadian businesses.”
The Chambers have also revamped the chambercheck website (which offered timely resources for businesses during the pandemic) to provide a growing list of trade-related resources to inform and assist businesses.
Reasons for businesses to remain confident and optimistic:
Economic Resilience Canadian businesses have demonstrated remarkable resilience in the face of past economic challenges. Our diverse economy and strong trade relationships beyond the United States provide a buffer against potential disruptions.
United Response The Canadian government, provincial leaders, and business organizations like your local Chamber of Commerce are presenting a united front in response to this threat. This co-ordinated approach strengthens our negotiating position and demonstrates our commitment to protecting Canadian interests.
Potential for Internal Growth For years the Chamber network has been encouraging the government of Canada to remove interprovincial trade barriers and unlock the economic prosperity lying dormant in these archaic policies. This situation presents an opportunity to address long-standing interprovincial trade barriers and by removing them boost Canada's economy by up to $200 billion per year, potentially offsetting the impact of U.S. tariffs.
Mutual Economic Interests It's important to remember that the proposed tariffs would also significantly harm the U.S. economy. American businesses and consumers would face higher costs and reduced competitiveness, which could lead to pressure on the U.S. administration to reconsider this approach.
Time for Preparation With the proposed tariffs not set to take effect until at least March 1, there is time for diplomatic efforts and for businesses to prepare contingency plans as we work our business contacts and channels to influence key stakeholders in the U.S.
Leveraging Canadian Assets Canada continues to highlight its valuable assets that are strategically important to the U.S., including:
By emphasizing these assets, Canada is demonstrating that doing business with us is not just beneficial but strategically smarter than alternatives.
Government Support The Canadian government has a track record of supporting businesses during trade disputes. We can expect measures to be put in place to assist affected industries if the tariffs are implemented.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
It has been nearly two decades since a rudimentary prototype of Twitter began to take shape in 2006 and quickly gained traction resulting in more than 100 million users producing 340 million tweets daily by 2012.
Seen initially as a great tool for businesses to promote their brands and messaging, the platform has undergone dramatic changes since billionaire Elon Musk’s takeover of X (formerly Twitter) in late 2022, and that has left businesses and advertisers re-evaluating their presence.
His vision for X as a “free speech” platform has been polarizing, with critics pointing to the rise in hate speech and misinformation. These concerns, coupled with strategic missteps, have led some businesses to leave the platform entirely or significantly reduce their advertising spend.
“None of the businesses I work with are using X right now because it just doesn't seem like a credible platform and they don't want to be associated with that right now,” says social media expert Ashley Gould, owner of Cinis Marketing.
“I think the premise of what Elon Musk was trying to do originally by opening it up with a huge emphasis on freedom of speech was meant to try and make it a safe space for everybody. The problem is we all don't share the same opinions and we don't share the same beliefs.”
Advertisers’ confidence eroded
As a result, she says those who thrive on hate mongering and perpetuating conspiracy theories have clearly found a home on X thanks to Musk’s decision to overhaul content moderation policies. A similar move also recently embraced by Meta CEO and founder Mark Zuckerburg for Facebook and Instagram.
Under previous management, Twitter (X) maintained strict guidelines to ensure a safer environment for users and advertisers. However, Musk’s looser approach has made some companies wary of associating their brands with potentially controversial or harmful content.
The New York-based Anti-Defamation League and other watchdog groups have reported spikes in hate speech and abusive language on the platform which has further eroded advertiser confidence.
Additionally, changes to the verification system—transitioning from a badge earned through authenticity to one purchased through Twitter Blue subscriptions—have muddied the waters for users and advertisers alike. The proliferation of impersonation accounts and disinformation has made it challenging for brands to trust the platform as a reliable advertising space.
Despite these challenges, X retains some unique advantages thanks to its real-time, text-focused format which remains unmatched for breaking news and direct communication. As a result, Ashley urges businesses not to delete their X accounts just yet.
Re-evaluate social media platforms
“But I wouldn't utilize it either because it actually could decrease your credibility if you're on there because people may make the assumption that you're ‘enjoying’ the drama.”
Instead, Ashely recommends re-evaluating your focus on social media platforms that would work better to promote your business’ brand, such as Instagram, Threads, Snapchat or Bluesky, even if your X (Twitter) account still retains thousands of followers.
“The ethical people that you’re looking to communicate with aren’t all on Twitter right now,” she says. “Even if they say they are and they’re still a follower, they’re not really there.”
Competitors of X, like Instagram, TikTok, and LinkedIn, have taken this opportunity to attract disillusioned businesses. These platforms offer more sophisticated targeting tools, robust safety features, and higher engagement rates, making them attractive alternatives for advertisers.
Meta’s Threads, a text-based platform launched in mid-2023, quickly gained traction as a ‘Twitter alternative’, luring away both individual users and businesses looking for a less volatile environment. As well, Bluesky introduced a suite of anti-toxicity features this past summer to combat harassment and provide a more ‘user friendly’ experience.
Multiple platforms not necessary
“It’s good to go with social media platforms that verify and are trying to keep the spam out,” says Ashely, adding it may not be necessary to be on multiple platforms depending on how you’re trying to promote your brand.
“You have got to step back and ask yourself what kind of content are you creating? Who are we trying to make it for? And then really focus on that community side, not that you have 50,000 followers. That’s great, but if nobody's talking to you where's the ROI?”
As X continues to evolve, the long-term viability of its business model remains in question as Musk mulls over potential plans, such as integrating payment systems and expanding into content creation. However, the platform’s reputation as a stable and trustworthy space for businesses has been significantly tarnished.
For now, the exodus of advertisers serves as a cautionary tale about the delicate balance between free expression and the need for moderation in digital spaces.
“They broke it (X) in two years, maybe they can fix it two years?” jokes Ashely. “Unfortunately, my crystal ball is broken, so I can't see if that's actually going to happen.”
Tips for Businesses When Selecting Social Media Platforms:
1. Understand Your Target Audience Before diving into any platform, research your audience's demographics, interests, and online habits. Platforms like TikTok appeal to younger users, while Facebook often caters to an older demographic. LinkedIn is ideal for B2B professionals, while Instagram attracts visual-centric audiences. The more aligned the platform is with your audience, the more effective your efforts will be.
2. Define Your Goals Are you looking to drive website traffic, increase brand awareness, generate leads, or build a community? For example, Instagram and Pinterest are great for showcasing products, while Twitter excels in real-time engagement. Matching your goals with platform strengths ensures better ROI.
3. Consider Content Formats Different platforms excel in specific content types. Instagram and TikTok thrive on short, engaging video content, while LinkedIn favors professional articles and thought leadership. If you lack resources for creating high-quality videos, focusing on text-based platforms like Twitter or LinkedIn might be more manageable.
4. Assess Your Industry Presence Analyze where your competitors and industry leaders are most active. While you shouldn’t copy them outright, understanding their strategies can help you identify relevant platforms and trends. A strong presence in the right niche can give your business a competitive edge.
5. Evaluate Platform Features and Costs Some platforms may require higher advertising budgets to be effective, while others offer organic reach opportunities. Look into ad pricing, analytics tools, and features like shopping integrations to determine if a platform aligns with your budget and business model.
6. Start Small and Scale It’s better to focus on one or two platforms and excel rather than spreading resources thin. Once you’ve established a strong presence, expand to other platforms that align with your strategy.
7. Monitor and Adapt Social media trends evolve quickly. Regularly analyze performance metrics, keep an eye on emerging platforms, and adapt your strategy as needed to stay ahead. |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
As businesses navigate an era of rapid technological evolution, shifting workplace dynamics, and global interconnectedness, preparing your workforce for 2025 demands strategic foresight.
The key to success lies in fostering adaptability, embracing technological advancements, cultivating a culture of continuous learning, and prioritizing employee well-being.
“Whether it's the benefits program, whether it's salaries, the expectations of employees have gone up and I think also to the expectation of the business culture,” says Frank Newman, owner of Newman Human Resources Consulting. “I think people are making more and more decisions based on workplace culture.”
He says since the pandemic, the continuing trend of creating a strong workplace will become even more apparent in 2025 and beyond as potential employees look for reasons why they should work for a particular company.
Strong communication
“If a business owner can't answer positively what it's like to work there, then that’s going to be a problem,” says Frank. “As an employer, you have to look at your internal culture and determine what is it like. Are we behaving as we say we are? What are our values? And because it's still a competitive world out there, how do we differentiate ourselves?”
Ensuring your company brand is on target is key when it comes to navigating the current hiring environment, which he believes has become less civil since the pandemic in terms of the way some potential employees disrespect a company’s time, in some cases by not even showing up for a scheduled interview.
“I think as people we've got used to a little bit lower standard. So, as an organization, if you want to be the preferred employer or even the preferred partner to work with as a business partner, you need to up your game a bit because that's going to put you in good stead for the long run,” says Frank, adding sending a ‘thank you’ response to potential candidates just for applying is one way to make a positive impression.
“You want to make sure you increase your communication standards because everything is now subject to online reviews. The whole review concept is important - whether it's employee reviews or whether it's customer reviews – and to be aware and make sure you check them monthly because you don't know what people are going to say about your business.”
Safe environment needed
Good communication with employees also remains key, he says, noting in wake of the pandemic mental health issues continue to be an ongoing issue for many companies.
“The latest trend now is to make sure you have an employee assistance plan that can help with mental health and other counseling needs people have,” says Frank. “We live in an age of stress. It’s about having some tools for people to access, such as mental health professionals, or even just making sure that employees feel comfortable sharing.”
Creating a psychologically safe environment is a big part of developing a mental health strategy that works, taking into consideration the various pressures employees are under at work and at home.
Frank recommends conducting a pulse survey as a way to quickly collect feedback from employees to gauge their impressions of where the company stands at the moment. Depending on the size of your workforce, he says sitting down for a coffee and an informal chat can also be just as effective.
“It’s about keeping an ear to the ground in terms of what your employees are feeling and facing,” he says. “We don’t want tone deaf business owners; that’s not going to cut it these days and I think people are looking for more humanity from their business leaders.”
A continued trends towards hybrid work situations could also play into that sense of humanity as employers look for ways to engage with their online workforce.
“You’ve got to make sure you are finding ways to leverage that and build those connections when people are isolated at home,” says Frank, noting that many employers continue to see a surge in potential applicants when it comes to offering hybrid work. “Managers must think about that and what it does to their recruiting.”
Investing in leaders
He says trusting your employees promotes growth and productivity, and that mistrust erodes confidence.
“What companies should be thinking of now is really investing in leaders. So, it’s important to make sure your leaders are connecting with their people and being authentic,” says Frank. “Most people leave an organization not because of work, but because of the boss.”
He says trust also works in both directions, especially when it comes to companies maneuvering through the current economic and political turmoil facing businesses in North America.
“It’s really about planning ahead and also letting your employees know that you’re taking things seriously and have plans in place to deal with these issues, because sometimes they are not aware of what management is doing and that may create some uncertainty,” says Frank, noting when it comes to the future, a strong AI strategy to assist employees boost their productivity is also a key consideration. “Companies should be leveraging that as much as possible.”
How businesses can prepare their workforce for the challenges of the near future:
1. Embrace Technological Integration The workforce of 2025 will operate in a tech-driven environment. Businesses should:
2. Prioritize Employee Well-Being The pandemic highlighted the importance of mental health and well-being. A healthy workforce is a productive workforce. Companies should:
3. Focus on Reskilling and Upskilling As technology advances, certain skills will become obsolete while others gain prominence. To stay ahead:
4. Foster Agility and Innovation The ability to adapt to change and innovate will be critical in 2025. Encourage:
5. Leverage Workforce Analytics Data-driven decisions can significantly enhance workforce management. Businesses should:
6. Commit to Sustainability The workforce increasingly values companies that prioritize environmental and social responsibility. Businesses should:
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The following column by Cambridge Chamber President and CEO Greg Durocher appears in the winter edition of our INSIGHT Magazine
There’s a chance we might be panicking over nothing after Donald Trump was again elected this past fall as President of the United States, defying political norms in a way few others have.
Despite being a convicted felon—yes, by a jury of his peers, not a partisan judge—Trump secured his return to the highest office in the land, with a staggering 34 convictions under his belt. His campaign rhetoric was, as always, polarizing and often crossed the line of decency.
Politics has clearly changed since there was a time when even a fraction of Trump's controversies would have ended a political career. Yet here we are. Some Canadians celebrated his victory, but it perplexes me why anyone north of the border would since he has demonstrated little regard for Canada, dismissing us as an afterthought despite our deep economic ties.
The truth is America’s prosperity is intrinsically linked to our resources and partnership.
Canada: An Indispensable Ally
Consider this: 60% of the crude oil the U.S. consumes comes from Canada. Saskatchewan supplies uranium, which is essential for energy production and national security, and potash essential for the agriculture industry. Quebec powers the northeastern United States with hydroelectricity. Alberta’s natural gas and Canada’s aluminum and steel exports are cornerstones of U.S. infrastructure.
But what would happen if we turned off the taps? A trade war would hurt us both, but Canada’s contribution to the U.S. economy is undeniable. Trump’s focus should be on challenges like China and Russia, not antagonizing U.S. allies.
Revisiting NAFTA and Trade Tactics
However, his threats are nothing new since we’ve seen this playbook before. In 2016, Trump declared NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) dead, demanding a "fair deal." After much posturing, the agreement was merely updated—something long overdue. Trump called it a victory, and his supporters cheered him on, but the changes were only modest at best.
Similarly, his famous promise to build a wall funded by Mexico resulted in just 732 km of construction—most of which replaced existing barriers. Mexico, of course, didn’t pay a dime and some of the "new" wall even deteriorated quickly, bogged down by allegations of corruption among Trump’s staff.
The Reality of Trump’s First Term
Let’s be honest—Trump’s first term was marked by unfulfilled promises and many controversies. His pandemic response was completely disastrous, with state governors openly criticizing his lack of leadership. Who could forget his infamous suggestion to inject bleach as a COVID-19 treatment? Why would a person even suggest that? Trump signed agreements that drove up gas prices, contributing to inflation.
Running a country is vastly different from running a private business, and Trump’s approach often revealed his lack of governance expertise.
What’s Next?
His 25% tariff plan threat on Canadian goods are likely bluster—an opening gambit to pressure Canada and Mexico into renegotiating trade agreements. It really is a strategy very reminiscent of his NAFTA theatrics.
In the end, we’ll likely see a slightly revised deal that Trump will tout as another one of his "wins." Of course, his base will applaud, despite little substantial change.
Canada’s Challenge
For Canadians, Trump’s presidency is very concerning since his leadership style— always chaotic and self-serving—offers no real benefit to Canada. Therefore, we must brace ourselves for uncertainty and prepare to protect our interests.
Meanwhile, south of the border, Americans will face the consequences of his polarizing and often ineffective leadership.
In the end, Trump’s bravado may have won temporary support from his base, but we must remember it’s critical to separate rhetoric from results. As the old saying goes, “Be careful what you wish for—you just might get it.” |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The small Canadian businesses with high-growth potential and expectations might not be the ones you have in mind, says a new report from the Canadian Chamber of Commerce’s Business Data Lab (BDL).
The report, entitled Scaling Success: The Characteristics of High-Growth Small Businesses in Canada, shows that while many Canadians might think of the tech sector when thinking of firms with high-growth potential and expectations, the common characteristics for small businesses that are most likely to project high growth are, in fact, quite different. These firms typically:
The findings in the report do not come as a surprise, says Cambridge Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Greg Durocher, noting the important impact small and medium-sized businesses have on our economy.
“A lot of people, especially those in decision-making positions of the government, look at small businesses as ‘mom and pop’ organizations on ‘Main Street’, but overlook the fact that even the major employers we have in this country today all started off as small businesses,” he says, noting the success of a previous Cambridge Chamber program several years ago that promoted small businesses called Small Business Too Big to Ignore. “Everything starts small and it’s one step at a time to reach the pinnacle of corporate success.”
According to Statistics Canada, approximately 98.6% of businesses are considered small with less than 100 employees and historically, small businesses have been a key driver of job creation in Canada, employing nearly 70% of the private sector workforce. Despite slower employment growth over the last four years, small businesses continue to account for almost (43%) of all job gains.
Greg says the government, both federal and provincial, must recognize the fact that growing small businesses is the future of economic growth and prosperity in Canada.
Stronger government connections needed
“It’s kind of like nurturing a child. You want that child to be extremely successful and we as parents do things to help that child through the growing and learning years. It’s the same thing government needs to do for small businesses,” he says, adding this is particularly key for a growing number of businesses started by newcomers. “They are coming to Canada for an opportunity and in many cases, they are starting small businesses because they have skills or expertise in other areas but can’t find work, so they create their own opportunities.”
The report details how approximately 12% of small businesses project growth of 11% or more, compared to almost 8% of medium and large businesses. Three percent of small businesses believe they can achieve “high-growth status,” defined as annual growth of 20% or more.
To help small businesses scale effectively, the report recommends public policy that targets firms’ biggest challenges by simplifying financing, reducing regulatory burdens, fostering export growth, and prioritizing upskilling.
To assist, Greg says the government needs to create stronger connections with small businesses which isn’t easy since nearly one and half million exist in Canada and that their ‘voices’ are often watered down. More often, he says decision-makers can easily connect with much larger businesses since there are fewer of them.
“In most cases they are household names and really big companies,” says Greg, noting these same companies often rely on smaller businesses as suppliers. “But the fact of the matter is that small businesses really need a hand up and support to grow to become medium sized or larger employees.”
Chambers a conduit for government
He says Chambers of Commerce, located in most communities nationwide, are the ideal conduit for government to nurture connections with those smaller operations.
“The mantra of ‘Small Business Too Big to Ignore’ is something the Chamber network should be carrying as a banner. That’s our wheelhouse. We have a personal relationship with these businesses.”
The report also underscores increased input costs, inflation, difficulty attracting and retaining labour, and weak consumer demand as key challenges to growth. The most crucial factors for growth include access to financing, the ability to export, technological adoption and a supportive policy environment.
“Canada needs more high-growth firms,” says Marwa Abdou, the report’s lead author and BDL Senior Research Director. “Years of slow economic growth, low productivity and underinvestment have weakened our global competitiveness and resulted in declining living standards for Canadians. Historically, it’s small businesses that have been a key driver of job creation in Canada.”
Click here to read the full report. |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The following column by Cambridge Chamber President and CEO Greg Durocher appears in the fall edition of our INSIGHT Magazine
I’m not sure you are with me on this, but I am perplexed and concerned about the anger and vitriol commentary coming from not only politicians, but more so these days from the voting public.
I recall the early days of the environmental movement and the efforts made to get politicians to believe it should be a concern for everyone, especially now considering the mild winters we’ve been experiencing. Many blamed politicians for not acting fast enough. However, in all fairness to them, it was the voters who put “climate” further down the list of priorities of what they wanted their government to do for them.
However, it did ignite the creation of the Green Party, and while their optimism and frustration often appeared to be on high volume, back then there wasn’t much name calling, lying, fabricating and conspiracy theories surrounding this issue.
In the 1980s, the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) was the big issue, and the Progressive Conservative Party led by Brian Mulroney won a majority government by making it the focus of the campaign. However, while the Liberals, led by John Turner, and the NDP, led by Ed Broadbent, vigorously campaigned hard against the FTA, there were no stones being thrown, literally or figuratively.
Today, every social media stream is filled with vitriol commentary aimed not at the ideas, but rather at the people behind them. There appears to be a feeling that we need to beat people down because it’s believed this is the only way to get them to change their minds, or the only way we can convince others to think the same way. While Canada’s national election campaign hasn’t started (officially), we’ve seen this scenario play out in the United States’ election race as actual policies have taken a backseat to insults and taunts.
Democratic process remains
What has changed in politics? Certainly not the process since we live in a democracy that provides us with the opportunity to make, hopefully, an informed a choice every four years after following election campaigns covered by the media.
Sure, there are some mainstream media (MSM) outlets that have a bias, some more noteworthy than others, but at the core there are facts being reported. Sure, they edit and can pick out the worst of the worst, but it’s not like they are reporting things that didn’t occur.
I remember when John Tory, while vying to be Ontario Premier, supported universal government funding for all schools. Frankly, that wasn’t the whole story, but nonetheless, the MSM reported it and he fell off the cliff in terms of support.
Communication is important and can derail or rev up a campaign.
But today’s election campaigns have turned on the MSM, calling them “fake news”, calling out their reporters, vilifying the industry in favour of… you guessed it, their own made-up reporting on social media.
Right after the 2015 federal election where Prime Minister Justin Trudeau moved from third place to first place with a majority government, The Globe and Mail published a story stating that former PM Stephen Harper was the most bullied politician in Canadian history. Today, he wouldn’t even be in the top 1,000 and comparatively got off easy because Facebook and X (formerly Twitter) weren’t in the public domain until after he was elected.
It took a few years for people to understand how easy it was to hide behind a keyboard and say anything they liked.
Social media posts creating chaos
Don’t get me wrong, I love seeing photos online of family and friends living their lives, but there seem to be less of that compared to all the other trash which seems to fill our social media feeds. Someone really needs to figure out how many posts are valid compared to the amount which are strictly someone’s opinion or false.
I read a tweet recently by someone with 1.2 million followers, a supporter of former U.S. President Donald Trump, who posted that VP Kamala Harris was not eligible to run for President because she wasn’t born in the U.S. Well, despite that some Republicans don’t want to believe California is even in the U.S., she was in fact born in Oakland, CA.
But the problem is, potentially 1.2 million followers of this person may now believe that tweet. I also read a post where a U.S. senator has promised that if the Republicans win the Senate, he is going to reopen the case on former U.S. President Barack Obama’s birth certificate.
Stupid posts like these create the chaos we are experiencing and now that the horse is out of the barn, there is no putting it back in. If the executives of these social media giants get a kick out of the chaos they’ve created, they will never do anything to clean it up. Elon Musk has been using his social media platform ‘X’ to campaign for Trump and when he comes across conspiracy commentary, he generally hasn’t rebuked it, instead he retweets it with a “I wonder” attached.
Is it any wonder that we are having difficulty finding good candidates these days? Who wants to be the target of some tyrannical rage of baseless unvetted information?
Ignore conspiracy theorists
I have had my battles with the MSM in the past, but I’ll take them over any social media feed because at least there are guidelines and rules they must follow. On social media, it seems the more outrageous the better and it’s bound to only get worse since many major MSM outlets continue to restructure resulting in layoffs.
The light at the end of the tunnel appears to be growing even more dim for many mainstream media outlets. But I leave you with a very important question: Where will you get the REAL news when the MSM disappears? Will it be X or Facebook, Instagram, or even TikTok?
I think we all need to understand that what we see today is minor compared to what we will see just a few years down the road.
The next time we go to the polls, maybe, just maybe try to ignore the conspiracy theorists and crazies and instead read a newspaper (print or online) or listen to the radio - preferably 570 News Radio at noon on Sunday - or watch your favourite newscast on TV because you might just learn something factual about the candidates and their policies. |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
The strength of the Chamber network when it comes to advocating for the business community was very apparent recently as representatives from Chambers of Commerce and Boards of Trade nationwide recently gathered in Halifax to debate and approve policies aimed at boosting Canada’s economy.
Several hundred delegates gathered Oct. 16-19 at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce’s CCEC Conference and AGM to network, hear from several high-profile business and industry leaders, but more importantly debate policies that can make a difference at a time when Canada’s productivity is suffering to the point where we rank the lowest among the G20 countries, and small businesses continue to face hardships.
“I do think regulation is one of the biggest challenges facing Canadian productivity,” said Shaena Furlong, President & CEO of the Richmond Chamber of Commerce in B.C, while speaking as part of a panel discussion on the outlook for small business. “I think generally in Canada, and this is across all regions, we have problem in that the folks who are imposing regulations on business have only ever signed the back of a pay cheque and there is a sentiment that business and industry are a bottomless well and it’s not just true.”
Delegates were told by Isabelle Hudon, President and CEO of BDC, there are now 100,000 fewer entrepreneurs in Canada than there were 10 years ago, an issue touched on by outgoing Canadian Chamber President and CEO Perrin Beatty during a special tribute to his 17 years as head of the organization.
Network provides a strong voice
“Capital is fluid, and you are not going to know when an investor chooses not to stay in Canada or not to invest in Canada,” he said. “We need to increase our ease in doing business.”
However, Perrin credited the work of the Chamber network and its advocacy efforts to create a better climate for businesses.
“Businesses have never more greatly needed a strong, effective and organized voice,” he said. “I’m confident the Chamber can make an even greater contribution to Canada in the future. You are the ones who will carry out that mission. It will be your imagination and your commitment, your energy and your collaboration that will create a brighter future for our country.”
This sentiment is shared by Cambridge Chamber of Commerce President & CEO Greg Durocher who says a key role of Chambers is to develop policies that can lead to fundamental changes in legislation to create environments where businesses can thrive and in turn, communities can prosper. Greg attended the AGM, along with Board Chair Murray Smith and the Chamber’s policy writer Brian Rodnick.
“The policies approved by delegates at the Canadian Chamber AGM and Ontario Chamber AGM provide the tools needed to urge both the provincial and federal levels of governments to make decisions that can assist our economy,” he says. “The Chamber network from coast-to-coast provides a strong voice for businesses.”
At this year’s Canadian Chamber AGM, just over 40 of the policy resolutions presented by Chambers and Boards of Trade nationwide, were approved by nearly 300 voting delegates.
The policies – which now become part of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce’s ‘official playbook’ - touched on the following areas: taxation and finance; labour, skills, and immigration; transportation and infrastructure; agriculture; health; manufacturing; and international affairs.
A policy submitted by the Cambridge Chamber and four others co-sponsored by the Chamber received overwhelming support:
Calling for a comprehensive, independent review to simplify Canada’s tax code Delegates supported a call to reform Canada’s tax system by establishing an independent, comprehensive review of the tax system ensuring its terms of reference focus on simplification and modernization, identifying potential changes to encourage more economic prosperity for Canadians.
Implementing a Canada Trade Infrastructure Plan (CTIP) (co-sponsored) The Chamber network supported a move to have the Federal Government implement, in cooperation with the national business sector and Provinces-Territories, a Canada Trade Infrastructure Plan to guide future planning and construction activities. The hope is to help grow the economy nationwide and ensure that all trade corridors have the capacity to move Canadian goods and service as markets expand.
Increasing capacity across Canadian manufacturing (co-sponsored) Delegates supported a call for the Federal Government to implement a 10% refundable manufacturing investment tax credit for all operations nationwide, like the current Atlantic Investment Tax Credit.
Addressing the affordability crisis by getting back to fiscal balance & right sizing (co-sponsored) The Chamber networked supported a series of recommendations to bolster the economic wellbeing of the private sector, including working toward bringing down the level of debt, reviewing government expenditures, if necessary, via a Royal Commission, mandated reviews across all ministries and departments that re-examine government services and the implementation of a cash pooling arrangement within and between all departments and ministries.
Improvements to the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (co-sponsored) The delegates approved a series of recommendations calling for more public consultation when the legislation gets rolled out and assurance that regulations imposed on the industry allow it to remain competitive with other countries including our major trading partners. Also, the policy called for the Federal Government to separate AIDA from Bill C-27 to ensure that it receives due attention and is not held back by other controversial legislation as well as clarifying what makes an AI system ‘high impact’ to better enforce the regulations. |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
![]() |
Brian Rodnick 236 March 13, 2025 |
![]() |
Greg Durocher 41 July 28, 2023 |
![]() |
Canadian Chamber of Commerce 24 January 29, 2021 |
![]() |
Cambridge Chamber 2 March 27, 2020 |