Blog

The holiday shopping season is a bustling time for many businesses, but it also attracts increased criminal activity.

With higher foot traffic, extended hours, and valuable inventory on display, businesses can become prime targets for theft, fraud, and other crimes.

“It really is going to depend on the type of what business you have,” says Const. Chris Iden, Public Information Officer with the Waterloo Regional Police Service, explaining that putting promotional material or displays at the front of the business often limits visibility inside the store. “Business operators should make sure things are well visible from the outside since a criminal ultimately doesn’t want to be seen when they’re doing their act.”

Also, he says having security cameras is a plus for businesses, noting feasibility is often a big issue especially for smaller ones.

“If people are going to invest in a camera system, which I heavily encourage, just be aware that it’s not always a deterrent. But it does assist in the investigation quite heavily,” says Const. Iden, adding it’s become common for some businesses to be targeted multiple times by thieves. “What’s important is to make sure that you’re not setting yourself up again and you learn how a crime can be prevented from happening again.”

Break and enters a focal point

He recommends communicating with staff when it comes to strengthening your security measures, especially this time of year.

“Your staff is normally the eyes and ears of your business,” says Const. Iden. “They see what is happening.”

In terms of local crime overall, Const. Iden says a key focal point for WRPS is break and enters as well as robberies involving violence and weapons. 

Data shows that the Crime Severity Index (CSI) in the Waterloo Region decreased by 4.4% in 2023, with violent crime severity dropping by 5.7% and non-violent crime severity by 3.7%. These reductions suggest some success in addressing key public safety issues. However, despite this improvement, the region remains the second highest among major Ontario cities for severe crime, surpassed only by Thunder Bay.

“It goes without saying that gun violence throughout the region is a big focal point,” says Const. Iden.

Economic strains, organized crime, and the opioid crisis have been identified as significant contributors to crime in the region, which is why he says community engagement is pivotal. This includes having business owners or their employees immediately report incidents, depending on the situation, which may require a 911 call or by filing an online report.

“We take all that information in, and it helps dictate our strategized policing model,” says Const. Iden, noting the Galt core due its transient population and the commercial area around Hespeler and Pinebush roads due to its proximity to Highway 401 remain ‘hotspots’ for criminal activity in Cambridge.

Police reactively responding

“We have our (WRPS) direct action response team that’s constantly working in these two areas,” he says, adding the WRPS’ community engagement unit works closely with The Bridges shelter when it comes to the city’s unhoused population. “If we can get people to the resources they need and hopefully get them into some kind of subsidized housing, it will address these issues in the long term.”

But in the meantime, Const. Iden says the WRPS continues to reactively respond to calls from businesses, whether it’s a property crime or reports of unwanted persons.

“Businesses are reaching out and they’re curious since things are always changing. It’s hard to forecast how things are going to look in the future, especially since we’ve had such a social dynamic change in the last few years,” he says. “Our call volume is going up every year and it’s one of the challenges we have, but we’re definitely doing our best with what we’ve got, and I can tell you we are aware of the issues happening and are not turning a blind eye.”

Crime by the numbers

Regional stats compiled by the WRPS from Jan. 1-Nov. 14,  2023, and Jan. 1 to Nov. 14, 2024:

Commercial Property Damage

2023: 114 calls

2024: 93 calls

Unwanted persons (Commercial)

2023: 682 calls

2024: 711 calls

Commercial Thefts (Under $5,000)

2023: 322 Calls

2024: 272 calls

Shoplifting (Under $5,000)

2023: 819 calls

2024: 1223 calls

Implementing preventive measures can reduce risks and help your business operate securely. Here are some tips:

1. Secure Your Premises

Install High-Quality Locks: Use deadbolts and reinforced locks on all doors and windows.

Use Security Cameras: Install visible surveillance cameras both inside and outside the premises. 

Adequate Lighting: Ensure all areas around your property, including entrances, exits, and parking lots, are well-lit to discourage criminal activity.

2. Control Access

Restrict Employee Access: Limit who can access sensitive areas such as cash registers, safes, or stockrooms.

Key Management: Implement a key control system to track who has access to keys and change locks if keys are lost.

Electronic Access Systems: Consider using swipe cards or biometric systems for added security.

3. Train Your Staff

Recognize Suspicious Behaviour: Educate employees on how to spot and respond to suspicious individuals or activities.

Handle Cash Safely: Train staff to minimize the amount of cash on hand and make bank deposits at varying times to reduce predictability.

Emergency Procedures: Conduct regular drills so employees know what to do in case of robbery or other emergencies.

4. Invest in Technology

Alarm Systems: Install a reliable alarm system with motion detectors and glass break sensors.

Inventory Tracking: Use inventory management software to detect discrepancies that may indicate theft.

Remote Monitoring: Enable remote access to security systems so you can monitor your business anytime.

5. Collaborate with Police

Build Relationships: Develop a rapport with local law enforcement and participate in community crime prevention programs.

Report Suspicious Activity: Inform the authorities immediately if you notice unusual behaviour or suspect criminal intent.

6. Create a Community Network

Neighbouring Businesses: Share crime prevention strategies with nearby businesses to keep the area secure.

Join Business Watch Programs: Participate in local programs where businesses collaborate to deter criminal activity.

7. Insure Your Business

Adequate Coverage: Ensure your insurance policy covers theft, vandalism, and other potential losses.

Review Regularly: Update your policy as your business grows or changes to maintain adequate protection.

As of this week, the mayors in 26 fast-growing municipalities – including Cambridge, Kitchener, and Waterloo – are now empowered with new legislative controls after signing a provincial housing pledge as part of the Province’s target to build 1.5 million homes by 2031.

They join the mayors of the Toronto and Ottawa who were granted with these strong-mayor powers last fall giving them more executive power to – among other things - veto and pass bylaws pertaining to ‘provincial issues’, such as housing, with the support from only one-third of city council.

As well, under Bill 3 (Strong Mayors, Building Homes Act, 2022), the mayors can also propose budgets, appoint senior civil servants, create, and dissolve committees of council, plus bring forward matters for consideration to council if they feel they potentially advance a provincial priority.

“Municipalities are critical partners for our government as we help communities get shovels in the ground faster and work to build more homes,” said Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Steve Clark, in a press release. “By adopting ambitious and absolutely necessary housing pledges, these 26 municipalities have demonstrated they understand the importance of that target, and we are ensuring they have the tools they need to succeed.”

But just how these additional powers will impact Ontario’s housing crisis remains to be seen, according to many political analysts.

“Municipalities in a lot of ways have the least controls over the dynamics of the housing market,” says Wilfrid Laurier University Associate Professor Dr. Laura Pin, who specializes in policy, housing, and municipal politics. “The idea you can solve the housing crisis by interfering with local democracy should feel like a little bit of a red herring.”

She says municipalities are the ones ‘living’ the housing crisis as they look for ways to deal with homelessness and encampments, and believes this new legislation appears to put more of the responsibility on them.

“I really think municipal councils are trying to do everything they can to solve these issues, so the idea that municipalities are not effective decision makers or are not doing enough and that this is going to resolve the housing crisis just don’t make sense to me,” says Dr. Pin.

'Not in my backyard'

However, she does believe strong-mayor powers, as opposed to the ‘weak mayor’ system currently used in most Ontario municipalities which puts the decision-making power on local councils, could have an upside.

“It does force us to have a conversation around those ‘not in my backyard’ concerns that do get raised when we talk about new housing developments, so I think in so far as it might make us more critical of those types of concerns, I think that could be a pro.”

Some also believe giving these mayors the power to reverse council decisions to block housing projects that they believe should have been approved under provincial policy could help avoid lengthy appeals to the Ontario Land Tribunal, the majority of which end up siding with the developer. As well, it’s been noted providing budgetary control to the mayors may help them ensure there’s ample funding and staffing to support housing goals in their cities.

But for Dr. Pin, she wonders about the democratic implications of what these additional powers could mean.

“You’re actually giving the provincial government more of a say in local decisions,” she says, adding Ontarians feel closer to their local government representatives compared to other levels of government. “People are more likely to know their local councillors and likely feel they have a voice. I think they do care about this and are concerned and based on the public talks I’ve given I’ve had a lot of questions about these powers.”

However, the mayors of Cambridge, Kitchener and Waterloo have already publicly stated that having these additional powers will not deter them from governing in their current collective way, relying on the consensus of their council members to make the best decisions for their communities.

“I think people are concerned about taking the decision-making power away from local councils,” says Dr. Pin. “Historically, municipal decision making has always operated with a high degree of consensus.”

Strong mayor powers and duties include:

• Choosing to appoint the municipality’s chief administrative officer
• Hiring certain municipal department heads, and establishing and re-organizing departments
• Creating and dissolving committees of council, assigning their functions, and appointing the chairs and vice-chairs of committees of council
• Proposing the municipal budget, which would be subject to council amendments and a separate head of council veto and council override process
• Vetoing certain bylaws if the head of council is of the opinion that all or part of the bylaw could potentially interfere with a provincial priority
• Bringing forward matters for council consideration if the head of council is of the opinion that considering the matter could potentially advance a provincial priority

The race is on to determine who will represent Cambridge residents for the next term at City Hall.

Although the municipal election will be held Oct. 24, advanced voting begins Oct. 6 providing many of those seeking a seat on City Council a limited amount of time to garner support in their quest to make a difference in how our community remains a great place to live and do business.

“I think every level of government is important to business,” says Cambridge Chamber of Commerce President & CEO Greg Durocher. “There are federal, provincial, and municipal regulations that mitigate the growth of business and business owners need to pay very close attention to every level of government and participate by voting or campaigning, or supporting, or whatever they need to do to stabilize their business within the confines of Canadian democracy.”

In Cambridge, three new councillors will be seated at the table with the potential for several others if the incumbents fail to retain their positions. But whether the prospect of massive change around the council table is enough to sway more residents to vote remains uncertain since traditionally, municipal elections garner a lower voter turnout than provincial or federal races. In the last municipal race in 2018, voter turnout in Cambridge was 32.4% compared to the provincial average of 38.30%. Compare this to the recent provincial election which experienced a voter turnout of about 43.5%, one of the lowest in decades.

“Media tend to focus on national or provincial elections, and of course those are organized by political parties who are able to mobilize an enormous amount of activity and intention because they can spend a great deal of money and voters can easily identify who the political operatives are,” explains Dr. Dennis Pilon, Associate Professor, Faculty of Liberal Arts & Professional Studies – Department of Political Science at York University. “When you look at it from the point of view from the voters, the challenge they face is that it’s very difficult to get informed about what’s really at stake. For voters to work out what each individual (municipal) candidate represents without a party label is somewhat challenging.”

As well, Dr. Pilon is candid when he talks about the legislative controls at the municipal level, noting even their ability to determine land uses can be circumvented by developers through the Ontario Municipal Board process.

“When we look at how the founders of our country and current federal and provincial politicians look at local government, they deliberately made it the weakest level of government,” he says. “It has very little independent power and has almost no fundraising capacity and is completely controlled by the provincial governments.”

Despite that, Greg notes the fact municipal governments are responsible for many elements –waste collection, police, fire service, roads, water and sewer, snow removal – that provide business owners with the ability to operate their businesses.

“They make the community safe and habitable, so the people you need to run your business want to live in your community,” he says. “I think businesses should encourage their employees to get out and vote because local government is the one level of government that truly affects their everyday lives.”

But inspiring people to vote in a municipal election can be difficult.

“It’s not that people don’t care and are not passionate,” says Dr. Pilon. “But often it takes a huge issue to catalyze the public and give them a focus for their concerns.”

For example, he says the proposed construction of the controversial Spadina Expressway in Toronto in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and more recently the amalgamation plans outlined in former Ontario premier Mike Harris’ ‘Common Sense Revolution’ in 1995 mobilized an enormous amount of people.

“You have to have a big issue that’s going to affect the majority of people, and thankfully, we don’t have those big issues,” says Greg, adding even the approval of the LRT didn’t garner as much concern as expected. “When there are those neighbourhood issues, they generally don’t drive people to the polls.”

Dr. Pilon agrees and notes that even the current housing and homelessness issues facing most communities is likely not enough to inspire more people to vote.

“Historically, when we look over the 20th century, the market has had an uneven ability to respond to housing needs again and again. It’s not a new problem and not one that municipalities have the finances to deal with so there you’ve got this mismatch,” he says, adding it’s a difficult issue for local candidates to succeed with at the ballot box. “There will be no accountability on the issue because there’s very little that municipalities can do.”

Dr. Pilon says ‘dramatic events’ that rise above the ‘noise’ are needed to mobilize voters at the local level, which is difficult due in part to media cutbacks.

“A lot of local newspapers have taken a hit over the past decade, so people aren’t receiving as much local council coverage and that makes it difficult for them to find out what’s going on,” he says.

To encourage more voter participation, Dr. Pilon recommends several potential changes including allowing the formation of ‘slate’ parties in Ontario, similar in nature to what is allowed Vancouver, B.C., as well as reforming campaign finance laws to prevent developers from having too much ‘pull’.

“Another reform that would make a big difference is stop reducing the size of councils,” he says, referring to Premier Doug Ford’s reduction of wards in Toronto. “What kind of impact is that going to have on representation?”

In terms of representation, Greg says a party system is not the answer at the municipal level.

“People are there representing their neighbourhoods and community, their friends and family and the businesses they shop in,” he says, adding a party system doesn’t lend itself to this type of scenario and that leaving their own political ‘baggage at the door’ is key for a successful council candidate.

“You’re not looking for someone with a platform of ideas as much as someone who has leadership and communication skills and can deliver on the interest of the neighbourhood. You want an individual who is compassionate and understanding and can also communicate well to upper levels of government to make sure that the community’s broader needs that may relate to provincial or federal issues are understood and addressed as best they possibly can.”

To learn more about the 2022 Municipal Election, visit the City of Cambridge.

Ti's the Season, according to the Auditor General. What a wonderful Christmas present to hear about the waste, when some at this Christmas will go without even a decent meal. Just ONE of the wasteful acts by Government could have made Christmas a whole lot brighter for ALL the Homeless in the Waterloo Region, for the next 25 Christmas's. Shameful and disgusting, we don't need to change the people, the people need to change their attitude, there is simply no reason to accept incompetency from elected officials, they said they would watch our money, they even took an oath to do so, now lets hold them 100% accountable to do just that.